Judge Overturns Trump’s Executive Order Targeting Perkins Coie

A federal judge deems the executive order unconstitutional, emphasizing the importance of legal independence.

In a decisive ruling, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell struck down President Donald Trump’s executive order that aimed to penalize the law firm Perkins Coie. The order had sought to revoke the firm’s security clearances, restrict access to federal buildings, and terminate government contracts, actions Judge Howell described as “an unprecedented attack” on the judicial system.

Judge Howell’s 102-page opinion highlighted that the executive order violated the First, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments of the Constitution, stating that it was a retaliatory measure against Perkins Coie for its representation of clients and causes disfavored by the administration. She emphasized the critical role of independent legal counsel in upholding the rule of law and protecting constitutional rights.

Perkins Coie, known for representing high-profile clients, including Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential campaign, welcomed the ruling. A spokesperson for the firm stated, “This decision reaffirms the fundamental principles of free speech, due process, and the right to legal representation without fear of government retribution.”

The executive order was part of a broader pattern of actions by the Trump administration targeting law firms associated with political opponents. While some firms chose to comply with similar orders to avoid conflict, Perkins Coie challenged the directive in court, leading to this landmark decision.

Legal experts view the ruling as a significant affirmation of the independence of the legal profession and a check on executive overreach. The decision underscores the judiciary’s role in safeguarding constitutional protections against politically motivated actions.

For more detailed information, you can read the full court opinion here.